On 2020-03-10 19:54, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
A few things to improve.

The binding should be a separate patch.
subject - shall start with dt-bindings:
Shall be sent to deveicetree mailing list.

Hi Sam,

Thank you very much for your review.
I did consider this. The reason I combined the patches, is that the binding depends on the display so I thought they were related in some way. Didn't know the correct procedure to handle this. I will split them apart in v2.

---
 .../display/panel/starry,kr070pe2t.txt        |  7 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/starry,kr070pe2t.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/starry,kr070pe2t.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/starry,kr070pe2t.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..699ad5eb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/starry,kr070pe2t.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Starry 7" (800x480 pixels) LCD panel
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "starry,kr070pe2t"
+
+This binding is compatible with the simple-panel binding, which is specified
+in simple-panel.txt in this directory.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
index e14c14ac6..027a2612b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
@@ -2842,6 +2842,29 @@ static const struct panel_desc shelly_sca07010_bfn_lnn = {
        .bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X18,
 };

+static const struct drm_display_mode starry_kr070pe2t_mode = {
+       .clock = 33000,
+       .hdisplay = 800,
+       .hsync_start = 800 + 209,
+       .hsync_end = 800 + 209 + 1,
+       .htotal = 800 + 209 + 1 + 45,
+       .vdisplay = 480,
+       .vsync_start = 480 + 22,
+       .vsync_end = 480 + 22 + 1,
+       .vtotal = 480 + 22 + 1 + 22,
+       .vrefresh = 60,
+};

Please adjust so:
vrefresh * htotal * vtotal == clock.
I cannot say what needs to be adjusted.
But we are moving away from specifying vrefresh and want the
data to be OK.

Just like Ville Syrjälä, I ran the numbers and vrefresh indeed calculates to 59.58.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/280a128711458950b55b070dbf6f07a1%40pascalroeleven.nl.

Reply via email to