On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:04:03 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Even though the previous binding made it a required child node, the
> implementation in Linux never made it mandatory and just ignored thermal
> zones without trip points.
> 
> This was even effectively encouraged, since the thermal core wouldn't
> allow a thermal sensor to probe without a thermal zone.
> 
> In the case where you had a thermal device that had multiple sensors but
> with enough knowledge to provide trip points for only a few of them,
> this meant that the only way to make that driver probe was to provide a
> thermal zone without the trips node required by the binding.
> 
> This obviously led to a fair number of device trees doing exactly that,
> making the initial binding requirement ineffective.
> 
> Let's make it clear by dropping that requirement.
> 
> Cc: Amit Kucheria <am...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-zones.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20210723220330.GA2674905%40robh.at.kernel.org.

Reply via email to