On 21/07/2021 16:04, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Even though the previous binding made it a required child node, the > implementation in Linux never made it mandatory and just ignored thermal > zones without trip points. > > This was even effectively encouraged, since the thermal core wouldn't > allow a thermal sensor to probe without a thermal zone. > > In the case where you had a thermal device that had multiple sensors but > with enough knowledge to provide trip points for only a few of them, > this meant that the only way to make that driver probe was to provide a > thermal zone without the trips node required by the binding. > > This obviously led to a fair number of device trees doing exactly that, > making the initial binding requirement ineffective. > > Let's make it clear by dropping that requirement. > > Cc: Amit Kucheria <am...@kernel.org> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech>
Applied, thanks! -- D. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/f0ca864a-ec20-4ad3-8876-6d73eae4a779%40linaro.org.
