On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 19:36:29 +0100 Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 1:32 PM Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm proposing to include them under the existing entries, as that seems > > like the most obvious place to include them. However, there are multiple > > ways to do this. If you prefer to have them elsewhere, I would also be > > happy to create a new entry with me as maintaining them, or I'm also > > willing to be listed as R: under the entry. Regardless of how we list > > them in MAINTAINERS, I will be around if anything comes up. Let me know > > what you all prefer. > > I think this was meant to go after the `---`? > > Whatever Steven et al. are happy with, this looks fine, thanks! > > Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> > I guess the question is are those with expertise on the list of people to Cc? I think it may be better to have a separate section for RUST so that the rust maintainers can be included in the M: part too. Perhaps: STATIC BRANCH/CALL (RUST) and TRACING (RUST) And have the M of the other sections be R here? -- Steve
