On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 10:37 PM Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:27:10PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:54:08AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:10:31 +0000 > > > Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > And have the M of the other sections be R here? > > > > > > > > Sure, we can do that. > > > > > > > > Are you still willing to pick up the patches? I think that is simpler in > > > > case there are any series that touch both the C and Rust parts. (Such as > > > > the initial tracepoint series did.) > > > > > > Yes. So I guess you can still add me with a 'M:'. But I wanted a separate > > > section so that all the Rust expertise is still included. > > > > What about the STATIC BRANCH/CALL subsystem? Should I also leave you or > > someone else as 'M:' there? It's unclear to me who usually picks up > > patches for STATIC BRANCH/CALL when they are not a dependency to a patch > > for somewhere else. > > I think that'd be me -- I typically do the static branch/call bits.
Ah, thanks for the clarification. Are you ok with using the approach Steven suggested for STATIC BRANCH/CALL subsystem too? That is, add a [RUST] entry below the current one, list you and me as M:, and anyone else in the main entry as R:, and patches land through the same tree as where they would have landed if they were a C patch. I'm open to whichever setup you prefer, but I think it'd be nice to get these files into MAINTAINERS somewhere. Alice
