Hi Matt, > Are there any plans to make the next pointer work for all URB types? That > is, a pointer such that, once an URB is completed, the URB pointed to by > the next pointer will get auto-submitted, hopefully on a "very fast" basis? I don't have any such plans, but I can't speak for anyone else ... :) Is there some reason that it'd be awkward for a completion handler to do that? Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems to me that a driver preparing an urb in advance can just as easily save its pointer (in what urb->context points to) and submit it as appropriate in completion processing. - Dave _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
- [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] queueing URBs? David Brownell
