> > USB folks, what is the general rule here ? Can completion handler free urb
> > or not ?
> > If urb is allocated dynamically it makes sense to allow completion handler
> > to free it.
>
>As Oliver stated, this is messy :)
>But the good news is that for 2.5 all of this is fixed, and you can just
>call usb_free_urb() whenever you want and nothing bad will happen if the
>USB host controller driver still needs to use the urb for something.
Heck. I guess I can't just say that BlueZ requires 2.5 kernel :)

How about ENXIO error in submit_urb ? Should we fix uhci ?

Max




_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to