> > USB folks, what is the general rule here ? Can completion handler free urb > > or not ? > > If urb is allocated dynamically it makes sense to allow completion handler > > to free it. > >As Oliver stated, this is messy :) >But the good news is that for 2.5 all of this is fixed, and you can just >call usb_free_urb() whenever you want and nothing bad will happen if the >USB host controller driver still needs to use the urb for something. Heck. I guess I can't just say that BlueZ requires 2.5 kernel :)
How about ENXIO error in submit_urb ? Should we fix uhci ? Max _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
