> > Is it valid to assume that if disconnect method is running completion
> > handler for bulk transfers will be called _only_ as a result of 
> usb_unlink_urb ?
> > assuming that urb doesn't have a timeout of course.
>
>No, this is not the case.
>The only guarantee you have to make. On return from disconnect
>all urbs have to be unlinked.
>Completion handlers may be running when disconnect is entered.
Sure. But _new_ ones will be called only because of the usb_unlink_urb called
by disconnect, right ?

Max


_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to