On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:24:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hmm. So arbitrary. Why only this single test? > uhci_submit_urb() starts with several sanity checks.
Only one of those checks needs to be done in uhci_submit_urb(), the urb->dev->bus->hcpriv one, as the others are already done by the usb_submit_urb() call. > And why precisely is it necessary? Because it looks like the host controller drivers are all expecting that usb_maxpacket() value to not be zero :) > Why does the kernel die? Does it hang in a spinlock with > disabled interrupts? Inspection of the code without this > stopgap might reveal other bugs. The host controller authors can answer this one better than I can. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
