Well, that's not what's happening. The only driver (AFAIK) which uses the non-default configuration is the SDDR-09 driver, which makes the call. And we don't ever use an interface other than that default, as far as I can see.
Matt On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:42:04PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2002, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow... old code. > > > > The SDDR-09 driver is, well, not one of our finest works. :) > > > > We call usb_set_configuration() to change to a specific alternate > > configuration for this device. Is there some sort of problem with calling > > that function? > > No, it's absolutely fine and encouraged. It's just that Andries stumbled > upon a situation where usb-storage used an endpoint with a 0 endpoint > size. > > That shouldn't happen unless usb-storage is using an invalid endpoint or > didn't call usb_set_configuration after using a different configuration > or didn't call usb_set_interface after changing alternate settings. > > Just pondering out aloud. > > JE > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver YOU SEE!!?? It's like being born with only one nipple! -- Erwin User Friendly, 10/19/1998
msg06475/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
