On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 03:10:15AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Greg KH wrote: > > >On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:51:31PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Greg KH wrote: > >> > >> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:36:25PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > >> >> but how long until that gets to 2.4? > >> > > >> >Who knows? Someone will eventually realize the goodness involved in it > >> >and take the time to backport it. > >> > > >> >You sent me a patch for 2.5, not 2.4 :) > >> > >> true. :) > >> > >> but, the patch should apply to the 2.4 kernel, and I think that in 2.4 > >> there is no way to get the info. If there is, please someone tell me > >> about it! ;) > > > >Isn't is in /proc/bus/usb/devices like you said in your original > >message? Yes, I know reading the bus multiple times is not "nice", but > >I view that as a whole lot nicer than adding an ioctl. > > active config is, active interface setting isn't. Unless I'm missing > something...
Looks like you are correct. I'd gladly take a patch for devices.c to add a "*" for the "I:" line to show this information. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
