Oliver Neukum [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > In a separate discussion with Mike, he mentioned that you can't > > scsi_remove_device() unless there are no pending commands. > > > > How the hell is an LLD supposed to assure that!?!? > > > > The minute I error a command and call scsi_done(), I can get a new one. > > Unless I lock out requests with scsi_block_requests(), but that comes with > > major warnings about needing to get unblocked. > > If I understand the scsi code correctly, doing that will result in a memory > leak at least. Perhaps exporting a function to declare a host's devices > offline might do the trick. But as yet I havn't found out where the scsi layer > actually checks that flag.
It is returned by scsi_block_when_processing_errors (upper level drivers opens, ioctl, etc). It is checked in scsi_decide_disposition the scsi_softirq / scsi_done side. It is checked in the command init of the upper level drivers during scsi_prep_fn. -andmike -- Michael Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
