> Matt's current proposed patch has the USB LLDD calling
> scsi_unregister_host() (because the device is respresented as an emulated
> host adapter) when it learns that the device is gone. Provided that
> routine doesn't block for very long, provided it handles all the details
> of hotplug notifications, and provided it guarantees that after it returns
> there will be no more calls to the emulated adapter, I don't see any
> problem. The LLDD can go ahead and remove all records of the former
> device, secure in the knowledge that all pointers to data structures and
> entry points have been erased.
>
> Isn't this exactly what everyone has been asking for and debating about?
If it only met the requirements, we'd be happy.
But it doesn't. By a large margin.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
