> From: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:13:07 +0100
> > > From: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 21:44:10 +0100 > > > > > > +#define __wait_event_timeout(wq, condition, ret) \ > > > + if (condition) \ > > > + break; \ > > > > I find it deeply disturbing to see this sort of trick. > > For one thing, it constrains you to a macro implementation. > > Why don't you take it to linux-kernel? > > I don't understand this remark. Could you elaborate? > What's wrong about adding the fourth macro of this kind to the > macros already present there? I asked on linux-kernel and nobody > so far has answered. Oh well, whatever. Indeed, it's all there already. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
