Hi!
> >>The "initiators" all talk to _both_ infrastructures, but they
> >>don't talk to the driver model stuff in the same way. For
> >>example, on suspend:
> >Where does acpi call pm_*()? It seems like it does not and it seems
> >like a bug to me.
>
> Doesn't; it showed up in a 'grep' that I should have examined
> more closely. Sorry! But both swsusp and APM have the "using
> both registration schemes" issue (consistency matters here).
>
> Why does it seem like a bug -- because it's using only the "new"
> infrastructure, while there are still a few drivers that only
> register to the old one?
Yes.
> I'd rather see those drivers (about
> a dozen) have compile time #ifdef CONFIG_PM #warnings, and call
> them the bug...
I guess I like that, too.. But at this point whole PCI relies on
old-style pm_*(); that needs to be fixed, first.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
