On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 11:49, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > - APM uses the pm_*() calls for a vetoable check, > > never issues SAVE_STATE, then goes POWER_DOWN. > > I remember the reason... SAVE_STATE expects user processes to be > stopped, which is not the case in APM. Perhaps that is easy to fix > these days...
No ! You may feel better stopping user processes (and actuallty you may require that for swsusp, I don't know) but the whole PM scheme is designed to make that unnecessary. I do NOT stop user processes on suspend-to-RAM on PowerMacs, I don't think neither APM nor ACPI need that (I may be wrong here, but if that is the case, then some drivers need fixing). Ben. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
