On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:50:47AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > I don't care which version of the patch gets accepted, so long as > > _something_ is done. Patrick, what do you think? > > I would rather we can modify the flags for any broken device and override > a host's setting for known functioning devices. But let's get some patch > applied.
Yes. But be sure to allow host drivers to adjust the flag within slave_config(); slave_alloc() may be too early. (Although since sd.c is the only driver that uses the flag, I guess it doesn't matter.) > If there is a problem (per Linus' post) in the USB transport this isn't a > real fix. The problems that Linus and many other people are seeing aren't in the USB transport; they are bugs in the device firmware. These bugs manifest as errors reported by the transport drivers. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
