On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, David Brownell wrote: > > That's a good rationale. (Although the fix would go into the > > scatter-gather library which belongs to usbcore, not in usb-storage. > > After all, there may be other drivers at some future time that also want > > to do low-overhead s-g transfers.) > > No, it should go _higher_ than that. The "no partial packets > in the middle of an sglist" policy belongs to usb-storage..
Does it really? It seems to me that anyone doing a bulk transfer using an s-g list would want to make it look like a single stream, i.e., no short packets in the middle. That's built into the USB standard: a short packet signals the end of a transfer. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
