On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 04:38:44PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > Can anyone answer the question in the Subject: line? Is it just an > historical relic? > > I'm not aware of any completion handlers using the pt_regs argument. And > handlers need not always be called from within an interrupt handler > in any case; they can be invoked during a timer callback for instance. > > Given that the pt_regs doesn't contain any useful information, isn't > guaranteed to be non-NULL, and isn't used anyway, why does it persist?
The input drivers pass this info on. They are the ones that need this information. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
