On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Erle Pereira wrote: > > received this message from stdlog... the message said to send it to this > > address... so i am > > > > the Device is a Concord DuoLcd Digital camera. It works ok, with hotplug and > > all. No issues seen thus far even with this msg quoted below > <SNIP> > > > usb-storage: This device (0595,4343,0100 S 00 P 00) has an unneeded Protocol > > entry in unusual_devs.h > > Alan, > > Again, still trying to catch up on the unusual_devs.h -- haven't really > had a chance to figure out all the flags yet. The entry covers a lot of > devices: > > /* Fabrizio Fellini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */ > UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0595, 0x4343, 0x0000, 0x2210, > "Fujifilm", > "Digital Camera EX-20 DSC", > US_SC_8070, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, 0 ), > > I'm wondering if it really needs to hit *all* of those devices. And > that's where I'm confused. Would I then contact Fabrizio and find out > what exact device he had and see if I can find a subset of devices that > need the patch?
It's not clear whether that entire range of bcdDevice numbers is needed. Offhand I'd guess Fabrizio's device was 0x2210 so he created the entry to cover everything up to that number. However, it doesn't matter. The message from Erle Pereira said that the Protocol entry wasn't needed, but the current entry has US_PR_DEVICE so the Protocol override has been removed. In other words, the correct action has already beeen taken. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
