On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Ben Dooks wrote: > > > I am reasonably sure that the _proper_ way to do this is close to the > > windows way with two resets, I have found a number of FTDI based > > devices do not like a single reset either. (I can't rember where I > > saw the double-reset, can't find it in the usb1.1 specification) > > Everyone seems to agree that following the Windows path is the best > approach. > > But I don't agree with your implication that the Linux approach is > _improper_. In fact, that approach (with just a single reset) is > recommended by the USB specification.
ok, sorry, it seems my old usb code has the wrong info in the comment, i've re-checked the usb1.1 spec, and it does not mandate the use of a double reset. -- Ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
