On Tuesday 19 October 2004 12:46 pm, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, David Brownell wrote: > > > If it was a VT6202, those have always made trouble; the VT6212 is > > much better. The EHCI 0.95 chips were less consistently implemented > > than the EHCI 1.0 ones, and at the very least some VT6202 timings > > caused strange things to happen. > > Where do I see the chip type? I got the card this year AFAIK, > can open the box to tomorrow to look at it. > > 0000:00:12.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 61) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) > 0000:00:12.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 61) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) > 0000:00:12.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 62) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) > 0000:00:12.3 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 46) (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
Well that "rev 62" EHCI means the chip is before the VT8235 south bridge which is at rev 82 ... without opening the box, you can at least see if the driver said "EHCI 1.0" or "EHCI 0.95". I suspect this is more like 0.95 and the 6202, than like 1.0 and the 6212, but I didn't know about a chip that also added a FireWire cell. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
