Am Dienstag, 30. November 2004 08:02 schrieb Meelis Roos:
> > I do not see a good solution at this time.
> >
> > rwsem is a non-starter. IMHO, rwsems are optimizations for normal 
> > semaphores,
> > and the code must remain correct regardless what is used.
> 
> Why is an additional lock needed at all? Why can't we just use devsem?

Good question, but it wouldn't help you, would it?

> Also, what exactly is the correctness issue here?

Some (storage) devices need a sequence of control messages in an
exact uninterrupted order. The patch includes a commentary explaining it.

        Regards
                Oliver


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to