On Thursday 03 November 2005 9:33 am, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, David Brownell wrote: > > > > One way to test this theory is to use the undocumented > > > "old_scheme_first=y" parameter for the usbcore module. > > > > Actually that doesn't get rid of the fault mode (short reads), it just > > moves it to a different place. > > It gets moved to a place where it won't execute at all if the old-style > code still works.
There'll still be a descriptor read where the requested and actual lengths disagree, though. > > Then there's the other fault mode, where > > if SET_ADDRESS fails it's not clear whether the address change actually > > took effect ... > > But that was present in pre-2.6.9 as well, so it shouldn't matter for > Charles. Well, given there can be multiple faults in those paths, it _might_ not matter. I suspect there could still be bad combinations, though they may well show up less regularly. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
