On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:54:41 +1100, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would also be worthwhile to see if you can get more or less the same > > effect without all those changes, just by increasing IDLE_TIMEOUT to 1000 > > ms or something like that. > > I did get similar throughput with IDLE_TIMEOUT set to 50000. 1000 > wouldn't be enough with 8K writes, as an 8K write often takes more > than one second. But I'm happy to redo some tests to be able to give > you clear before/after results. It'll probably have to wait a week or > so, as I've spent more time on this that I really should have lately. I don't understand why this happens. The HCD (uhci-hcd) knows when the bus is actually idle, so it can know when to set the timeout. Strange. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
