On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:38:51PM -0800, Micah Dowty wrote: > 1. usbfs seems to be the last thing to be updated when new > specifications are released. Current usbfs code still doesn't > allow full USB 2 high-speed support- how long will it take > to make sure its arbitrary limits are clean for WUSB?
Patches are always gladly accepted :) > 2. More importantly, validating URBs against the spec only helps > if your USB devices conform to the spec. Sadly, there are a > huge amount of devices out there that are broken to varying > degrees. We have at least one device that attempts to transfer > packets larger than its wMaxPacketSize. Should it be the > kernel's job to make these devices impossible to support? Devices like that surely never passed the usb.org test suite, right? And as such, should not be able to display the USB.org logos, and probably not work very well on any operating system... That being said, we should be able to handle things like this, and again, patches to accomplish this are always welcome. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
