Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:49:40 -0700, Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>> Why just certain entries?  Why not everything?
>>>
>>> It seems inconsistent (and an invitation for a zillion little patches) to
>>> only apply this to a select few devices which Pete happens to have.
>> I agree - I have no objection to adding this extra arguement to all of
>> UNUSUAL_DEVs.
> 
> I think that you are right, it's cleaner. But the size of this thing
> is intimidating. Please see attached...

Heh. I have faith in you, Pete. =)

So what criteria did you use to decide whether to set it to
USB_US_TYPE_STOR or "0"? I'm assuming 0 means usb-storage? Maybe I'm
just tired, but I don't see the code that uses this to make a decision
on which driver to use here in the patch...

Other than that, after a quick pass over it, it seems a lot cleaner.

I'll look more deeply and provide more feedback if needed when I get
some time.

-- 
Phil Dibowitz                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freeware and Technical Pages              Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/                   http://www.ipom.com/

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter and those who matter don't mind."
 - Dr. Suess


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to