On 10/7/06, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 06 October 2006 9:59 pm, Greg KH wrote: > > > > I didn't understand what was so objectionable with the alsa driver > > change in the first place, but oh well, I'll wait for the next > > iteration... > > One thing is that nothing actually prevented the resubmit from > getting the same fault code ... so there was no guarantee that > the problem actually got resolved!! :)
I answered that objection; you can't get two EL2NSYNC in a row. The first resets the stream (but does not revoke its bandwidth). EL2NSYNC is not possible for the first URB submission after reset. So there was a guarantee. Monty ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
