Yes the scanner is 20x slower on SMP vs. UP. Can test without SANE with VMWare 3.0 and native Windows Epson drivers, similar speed results SMP vs UP.
-JSP On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 10:37:45AM -0800, Greg KH wrote to To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 11:24:13AM -0500, Justin S. Peavey wrote: > > Symptom: Extremely slow performance on USB scanner with SMP kernel, > > about 20x what it should be (non-SMP) > > > > New Info: Based on advice from the sane-devel list, I booted with a > > non-SMP kernel and the scanner is not at full speed. What can I do to > > debug this further so a fix can be developed? > > > > The problem is the same with either usb-uhci.o or uhci.o, and with or > > without SANE. The evidence is pointing to a USB/SMP issue. > > So the scanner is 20x slower on SMP vs. UP? > And how can you test the scanner speed without SANE? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
