First: sorry for the two eMails (confusing, I know) :-( JE wrote: >> This is not an IRQ conflict between different devices !!! I tried this, >> when only usb-uhci was running on IRQ#9. > >I don't think anyone is saying it's an IRQ conflict. Sorry, my fault (non-expert trying to understand...)
For the topic: >> I'm running SuSE 7.2 - so it is distribution independent. I checked it >> to be hardware independent, BIOS option (PnP) independent, and >> IRQ-conflict-between-DIFFERENT-devices independent. So, I ask for the >> correctness of the driver for this chipset (see above) ! > >Like I said, it sounds like an IRQ routing problem. We've seen many instances of this >in the past. Does USB work for you in Windows? > Works perfectly under windows. >If so, I'd still like to hear what IRQ Windows thinks the device is on. > >JE Hope it helps solving the problem: Under windows we have the same IRQ: #9. And, btw. ioports are also the same under Windows (2000): 1820-183f : usb-uhci 1840-185f : usb-uhci Bye, -- J. Ziuber [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________________________________ 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de [EMAIL PROTECTED], 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-users
