I haven't seen most of the discussion to which you refer. (I don't
subscribe to any Linux mailing lists, since the use of the GPL is
unethical and Linux is -- unfortunately -- GPLed.) However, I reserve
the right to express my opinion and the course of action that I
advocate is still the same. Philips should not be approached in
an adversarial way, since doing so is likely to hurt rather than
help the chances of documentation being released.
--Brett Glass
At 10:42 AM 4/26/2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > >But anyway you can state your licensing problems on you webpage,
> > >but discussions about license models is not the topic of linux-usb.
> >
> > It relates to the discussion. Philips might be more inclined to reveal
>
>Brett, do yourself a favour. Take your ranting elsewhere. This is a USB
>list, the original post was vaguely on topic the following discussion
>has gone very off topic.
>
>Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
