Brad,

Thanks for the nice summary.

> 7.    I note the requirement for a programming guide per Clause 10.6:
> "As noted previously, the actual interfaces between the USB System and
> host software are specific to the host platform and operating 
> system. A
> companion specification is required for each combination of 
> platform and
> operating system with USB support. These specifications describe the
> specific interfaces used to integrate the USB into the host. Each
> operating system provider for the USB System identifies a compatible
> Universal USB Specification revision"

So for right now the Linux USB Programming Guide should say that
Linux USB supports the USB 1.1 spec?
(I didn't use the words "compliant" and "conform" on purpose;
they can be seen to carry too much baggage, but some word other
than "supports" could be used.)

> 10.   Generally looks like the existing architecture can be 
> adapted to the
> new requirements. Probably needs a new host controller driver, new (or
> substantially adapted) hub driver access to device, hub and host
> hardware, and about 6-10 weeks of development and test.
> 
> Has anyone established a link with NEC or NetChip (or any other
> organisation in 
> http://www.usb.org/developers/data/usb20/bbvendors.pdf)
> to establish initial sampling / product availability?

USB 2.0 host controllers listed:
Lucent
NEC
Philips


> Mainly for Randy: is there some way that this can be structured so we
> look professional and well organised? Perhaps a Linux International
> approach?

I'm not following your question/suggestion here, Brad.
Could you try to reword it?

Jon Hall at LI did say this back in Feb. (altho I've had a real
difficult time contacting him lately about the Slashdot Beanie
award transfer):

<quote>
Also, you may be interested that we are going to accept affiated groups into
LI.
Examples of these groups might include USENIX, LSB, etc.  Additionally we
would
have Special Interest Groups (SIGs) that would work on special projects.
The
members of these groups will not have to be LI members, just people
interested
in that topic.  I am hoping that this will create a focus for commercial
organizations who wish to help Linux to meet Linux developers, and Linux
developers looking for commercial organizations to help their cause.  I
could
see "USB" being a SIG.
</quote>


~Randy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to