> > Johannes's devfs patches for USB have been especially difficult
> > for me to decide and no doubt I have taken a long time on it.
> > I really couldn't decide.
> >
> > Johannes and David Brownell had some good discussion and some good
> > progress with JE's patch, and my thanks to David Brownell for
> > experimenting with this patch.
>
> David was the only person to give me feedback. Thanks David. I appreciate
> it.

For the record, despite all the discussion about wanting a USB Daemon
to autoload drivers, I've gotten no feedback about the two different
implementations I provided ... or, more significantly, the shell scripts
that they share to handle policies associated with driver loading and
subsequent configuration.

If folk are serious about dynamically loading USB modules, I'd expect
to see some more discussion on standards for such administrative policies.

My tentative conclusion is that not many people have gotten beyond the "yay,
my device works!!" stage to the "Wow, 2.4 does USB Plug'n'Play !!" stage.

That's a matter of time of course, but I'll encourage more folk to put
that higher on their priority lists ...


> I'll work on splitting out the unrelated features of my previous patches
> and send them to Randy and the list ASAP. These are unrelated to anything
> with devfs. I expect this will be sent today.

Good.  I'd pointed out to Randy that I wanted to see two of them
(the ioctl to expose driver-to-interface binding, and seeing all
the device and config descriptors) in 2.4 regardless.

- Dave





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to