On Wed, May 31, 2000, Thomas Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> 
> > Ugh, before anyone starts, please don't bring the binary vs machine
> > parsable ASCII war onto linux-usb. Leave it on linux-kernel please.
> 
> WTF are you smoking? I didn't start an ASCII vs. Binary flame war
> nor was it my intention. And accusing people who have different opinions
> than yours of wanting to start a flame war is a bit cheap, eh?
> 
> We had that discussion some time ago. Machine parsing devices wasn't
> even my idea, I think it was Greg Kroah's. I was even quite sceptic
> in the beginning.
> 
> But the format devices currently has is to make it machine parsable
> quite easily, do you really think it would look like it does now
> if it wasn't meant to be machine parsable?

Whoa. Look at the "anyone" part there. I was not accusing you of
anything. I was just stopping a flame war on linux-usb which is not
needed.

However, since you just did turn it into a flame war, I guess you do
fall under "anyone".

Anyway, like I was trying to say, this discussion is not appropriate
here.

> > This is incorrect. Please look at my last patch. I don't know which -ac
> > release it went into (or if even did go in), but it was sent on by Randy
> > atleast.
> 
> I fail to see how you could sanely get to the topology information
> with your patch and without using devices...

Whoa, whoa. Please quote everything next time:

<quote>

> > So basically, I'm wondering how to get all the info that's in the
> > devices
> > file, but on a per-device basis (by using the device nodes/files ?).  
> 
> If you really want to go that route, you need to manually issue
> control messages to each device in order to retrieve config
> descriptors.

This is incorrect. Please look at my last patch. I don't know which -ac
release it went into (or if even did go in), but it was sent on by Randy
atleast.

</quote>

I was referring to manually issuing control messages in order to
retrieve config descriptors. That is still incorrect.

BTW - According to Alan's changelogs, the patch has gone in.

JE


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to