On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi folks, > > while going through the dwc2 driver, I've found that there is a lot of > places that need info from the hwcfg registers. Currently, each of these > places do their own bitshifting and masking, but it occurs to me that > the code would become cleaner if all this happened in single place, so > all the other spots can just refer to a proper variable instead. > > I've made a start at implementing this, but before I finish up this > patch, I'd like to know what other people think. Is this a good idea, or > would you prefer to keep it like this? > > The advantage of this patch would be that the code is more clear. The > disadvantage is a couple of dozen bytes of extra memory used (though > this could be reduced to just a few to no bytes by using bitfields to > store the values instead, if preferred). Another disadvantage could be > that it would be a pretty big, but simple, patch to review.
Then do it one bit at a time (sorry, bad pun...) But yes, it does seem to be a good idea, as long as these options can't change over time. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
