Hi,

Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org> writes:

<trim>

>> Also note that the usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc() call on line 2067 of
>> gadget.c (as in my testing/next from today) won't even get executed, so
>> we're safe there.
>
> Never will be executed? then we can remove the
> usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc() (line 2025) at risk?
>
> 2023         clean_busy = dwc3_cleanup_done_reqs(dwc, dep, event, status);
> 2024         if (clean_busy && (is_xfer_complete ||
> 2025
> usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(dep->endpoint.desc)))
> 2026                 dep->flags &= ~DWC3_EP_BUSY;

hmm, now that I look at this again, in case of XferInProgress, we could
still have a problem.

I'll fix it up in that commit I pointed you to.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to