On 26 May 2016 at 18:27, Felipe Balbi <ba...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org> writes:
>> On 26 May 2016 at 17:45, Felipe Balbi <ba...@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Baolin Wang <baolin.w...@linaro.org> writes:
>>>
>>> <trim>
>>>
>>>>> Also note that the usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc() call on line 2067 of
>>>>> gadget.c (as in my testing/next from today) won't even get executed, so
>>>>> we're safe there.
>>>>
>>>> Never will be executed? then we can remove the
>>>> usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc() (line 2025) at risk?
>>>>
>>>> 2023         clean_busy = dwc3_cleanup_done_reqs(dwc, dep, event, status);
>>>> 2024         if (clean_busy && (is_xfer_complete ||
>>>> 2025
>>>> usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(dep->endpoint.desc)))
>>>> 2026                 dep->flags &= ~DWC3_EP_BUSY;
>>>
>>> hmm, now that I look at this again, in case of XferInProgress, we could
>>> still have a problem.
>>>
>>> I'll fix it up in that commit I pointed you to.
>>
>> Great. Thanks.
>
> fixed now:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/commit/?h=testing/next&id=983b84268656ff2686253b05097d28003bbec52f

OK. I'll test it again with applying your patch. Thanks.

>
> --
> balbi



-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to