Ha, very funny, In actual fact I am a network
engineer, I evaluate a clients existing (often MS) infrastructure, and try to
offer a cost effective and unbiased solution to their network problems. What do you think would
happen if I walked into a business with $50,000 worth of MS operating systems
and Windows based applications, and told them “nah, ya
system sucks!” Far better, me thinks, to
provide a range of possible solutions, from the ‘bare bones’ low
cost to ‘all the bells and whistles’ high cost alternatives, and
let the owner choose the option that they feel best suits their needs and budget. My personal recommendation is
a Windows front-end / Linux back-end, primarily because (and this needs to be
considered) the application software vendors often don’t provide a Linux alternative.
Hopefully, this will change, and I can recommend a full Linux/UNIX/BSD system (because
of the return on investment) in the years to come. All things considered, a
sound working knowledge of Linux/MS/Novell, and an understanding of their
respective strengths and weaknesses, is probably a good thing. |
- Re: MS troll DSA
- Re: MS troll Nick Rout
- RE: MS troll DSA
- Re: MS troll Jason Greenwood
- OT but darn funny Jason Greenwood
- Re: OT but darn funny Robert Fisher
- RE: MS troll DSA
- Re: MS troll Robert Fisher
- Re: MS troll Volker Kuhlmann
- Re: MS troll Wesley Parish
- Re: MS troll Nick Rout