Hi,
It has been roughly a year since CLUG had a general meeting. At that meeting
I was very keen to see CLUG get organised with a committee and have elected
officers to run the committee. And thus have people responsible for club
funds, minute/record keeping, chairing meetings, supper etc.
But to my disappointment no one became responsible for anything, as it was
decided to have a committee with no one elected for particular tasks. At the
time I could see the situation of many tasks falling on just one or two keen
individuals. The very situation I was trying to sort out by spreading the
work load over an entire committee.
I haven't been to many meetings this year as I have become interested in
other areas away from CLUG meetings. So I haven't much clue how things have
progressed. So maybe the ad-hock anarchic idea is great. I just donīt know?
However if things this year with CLUG havenīt been up to expectations. Then I
just want to raise the point once again. That CLUG may be a much better and
stronger organisation serving its members and possibly the community more if
it had the time proven normal club/society structure. With a proper
committee with elected positions. Thus making set individuals given set down
responsibilities, to serve CLUG members and the running of the organization.
regards,
Nick Elder
