> > Maybe. Or I have more professional requirements and been talking to a > > pro photographer who's just tried to buy something useful and failed :)
> This is the same type of argument (photographers rubbishing digital cameras) That's not what I said. Many photographers do use digital cameras for purposes where they're suited (that's why I'd like one too). It's also clear that even cheap 35mm SLR leave consumer digital for dead (at this point). You don't know what the requirements of the photographer in question are and therefore can't claim that his conclusions of digital are unjustified. > the quality measurement/acceptance should be made by > the end user i.e. the person reading the document or, in this discussion, the > person viewing the image. I never said otherwise. What was the answer to whether the files from cards of non-usb-storage cams can be read in card readers under Linux? (Assuming the card reader itself goes.) Is there always a fat filesystem on it? Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
