On Tue, March 11, 2008 8:51 pm, yuri wrote: > Is there any advantage to using samba in a Linux-only environment? > At the moment if I want to browse any other machine on the LAN I use > the "fish:" url in konqueror. > > 1) from a user's point of view, is "smb:" any easier to use than > "fish:" in konqueror? > > 2) from an admin's POV, is samba any better than running sshd on every > box? > > Or, are we talking six of one, half dozen of the other? > I understand that samba also shares other resources, but I have CUPS > for the only shareable resource on my LAN.
How do I mount a filesystem permanently and in which neither system complain if either the server or the client reboot using ssh? > > Yuri > > On 11/03/2008, John Carter wrote: >> Say "troubleshooting samba" to Google... and you will be Lucky. >> >> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch09_01.html >> >> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, David Lowe wrote: >> >> > I know it's quite low-level in the geek stakes, but would someone be >> able to >> > present something on configuring Samba? I'm tearing my hair out... >> cant >> > figure out why it works on one machine and not another... > -- Nick Rout
