On Sunday 03 March 2002 07:36 pm,David A. Bandel wrote: <snip> > > Actually, if you're using CSS, it makes pages easier to read with > browsers like Lynx, w3m, etc. It's only a problem w/ browsers that > don't follow the guidelines or worse are broken (i.e., they don't > ignore a style sheet command they don't understand, they implement it > improperly).
This is my big problem with old netscape and why I have been sticking to vanilla html. Also why I want to run 6.2 simultaneously. Style sheets looks like the way everything will go. > NS6 is the best, supporting CSS-2. Opera also is good > and may also implement CSS-2 (but at least understands CSS-1). I > personally plan to code for NS6 (CSS-2) and make sure it looks OK in > Lynx and just not worry about the others. Perhaps I should put a > "recommended browsers list" on my sites? > > One nice thing about CSS (which is why Lynx, et. al., work so well) > you can simulate frames without using them. But is anybody with a Windows PC or a Mac using it?? Unfortunately, I need a page that renders with the least common denominator browser. > This is very nice for > text browsers, which is why I'm switching to CSS completely. I > _hate_ frames with a passion. Haven't got that far in the book. Still learning how to do jpeg compression properly ;-) Thanks! -- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I'd rather be sailing" _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
