On 5/30/2002 3:21 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2002, dep wrote: > >>begin Tim Wunder's quote: >> >>| > no, in fact they went out of their way to say that a desktop >>| > distro *may not* carry the unitedlinux brand. >>| >>| Hmmm...OK, I obviously read it wrong. I just read it again and it >>| appears that you're right. But...Well...that just doesn't make any >>| sense... >> >>which is why we put up an editorial entitled "unitedyawnix" after >>going over it all a second time. we need to understand that we are >>mere users and therefore not only of no importance but in fact to be >>avoided. after all, it was companies, not users, who created linux in >>the first place, right? > > > What i'd really like to hear at this point is how the faithful from the > other threes' camps feel about this. > > Caldera has been screwing its user base for a couple years, so this is > really just business as usual. I thought that SuSE, Connectiva & Turbo > weren't this calous. Also, i get the impression that Caldera is driving > this. Anyone feel differently? > >
Nope. Not me. But, heck, I'm just a linux user. What do I know? _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
