On Thu, 30 May 2002 15:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2002, dep wrote: > > begin Tim Wunder's quote: > > > > | > no, in fact they went out of their way to say that a desktop > > | > distro *may not* carry the unitedlinux brand. > > | > > | Hmmm...OK, I obviously read it wrong. I just read it again and > > | it appears that you're right. But...Well...that just doesn't > > | make any sense... > > > > which is why we put up an editorial entitled "unitedyawnix" after > > going over it all a second time. we need to understand that we are > > mere users and therefore not only of no importance but in fact to > > be avoided. after all, it was companies, not users, who created > > linux in the first place, right? > > What i'd really like to hear at this point is how the faithful from > the other threes' camps feel about this. > > Caldera has been screwing its user base for a couple years, so this > is really just business as usual. I thought that SuSE, Connectiva & > Turbo weren't this calous. Also, i get the impression that Caldera > is driving this. Anyone feel differently? >
If Caldera is driving this, there's a Dead End sign just around the bend. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD? gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
