maybe my example is too easy... but I am no gcc expert.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:05:39AM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:yes, but what about all those 2.95.3 libaries? can 3.2.1 gcc binaries work with older 2.95.3 gcc librarise? I heard that 3.2.x is *not* downward compatible. You have to go all the away...Not my experience here.Kurt
-- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust. / v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org /( _ )\ Linux 2.4.20 ^ ^ 6:58am up 3 days, 17:44, 1 user, load average: 1.11, 1.09, 1.09 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
