can you correct me? I knew you knew what I was actually talking about.. :)
Net Llama! wrote:
errr...what's a "2.95.3 library"??
On 12/03/02 18:05, m.w.chang wrote:
yes, but what about all those 2.95.3 libaries? can 3.2.1 gcc binaries
work with older 2.95.3 gcc librarise? I heard that 3.2.x is *not*
downward compatible. You have to go all the away...
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. In Linux We Trust.
/ v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.20
^ ^ 6:58am up 3 days, 17:44, 1 user, load average: 1.11, 1.09, 1.09
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
