On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: > On 3/25/2003 9:31 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert E. Raymond wrote: > <snip> > >>Alternatively, use the 2.5.xx series. XFS support is built-in :D > > > > > > yea, but then he's really playing with fire. > > > > Although, I recently read that the kernel developers are after more > "real world" testing on the 2.5.x kernel. An article on Newsforge, or > linked from Newsforge a few days ago (last week?) > > Let's see if I can find it... > Ahhh... a linuxjournal.com article > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6740
yea, the one by greg KH. i read it, and he makes a convincing argument. however, i think if someone wants to play with XFS for the first time, doing it with a 2.5.x kernel is not the way to go. they need to minimize the opportunities for screwups, not increase them. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
