On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:45, Tony Alfrey wrote: > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 02:02 pm, Collins Richey wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:01:57 -0600 "Andrew L. Gould" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > So yes, he had a hand in many of today's circumstances; however, I > > > choose to disassociate today's SCO from Ransom Love's Caldera that > > > created eDesktop 2.4. (Ahh, the memories of my early newbiness.) > > > > Speaking of which, I was wandering through a MicroCenter store just > > yesterday and found a copy of Caldera OpenLinux between the RedHats > > and SuSEs. Shades of yesteryear. > > So my question is, if you bought that and loaded it up, would you be > guilty of violating some SCO license? <g> > And could you get the tech support advertised on the box?
The way I would read that is you could run it without threat from SCO since it is their product and it is based on the 2.2 series kernel instead of the 2.4. I don't think you would get support on it though since its past its support end of life date. Shawn _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
