On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:05:05 -0500 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consuming 0.8K bytes, Net Llama! blathered: > > On 11/13/03 17:04, dep wrote: > > > > >quoth Kurt Wall: > > >| Consuming 2.3K bytes, Net Llama! blathered: > > >| > I can vouch for this. My RH9 box is trashed as a result. > > >| > > >| [badly borken glibc] > > >| > > >| Whoops! > > > > > >leave it to redhat. what was it last time? gcc-2.7.6 or something? > > > > What last time? Let's not play revisionist historians, ok? > > Indeed. GCC 2.96; glibc 2.0.7; NPTL; problems running RPM on kernel > 2.5. Shall I continue? > I actually had fairly good results with fedora and RH7.3, but RH does have a few well recorded problems. Oh well, someone on the list used to fault me for my "bleeding edge gentoo." Life has been pretty stable on the bleeding edge. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
