Consuming 1.4K bytes, Collins Richey blathered: > FYI. > > >From time to time we have threads about the use of various filesystems (usually > degrades rapidly to "my fs is better than your fs").
Well, my FS *is* better than your FS, but I digress. ;-) [Gentoo description of XFS shortcomings snipped] This makes absslutely no sense. I have deliberately yanked power on a running system and haven't lost data. The explanation, at least the section quoted above, entirely disregards the transaction log, which is the reason that XFS is so good - it can replay or roll back the FS to a know state. Kurt -- If a 6600 used paper tape instead of core memory, it would use up tape at about 30 miles/second. -- Grishman, Assembly Language Programming _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users